A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
For ages, the admission requirements of national or international institutional colleges are based on number of factors ranging from final high school examination results, personal statements, national unified examination results, the institution's admission examinations amongst others. Of all these examples cited, the most considered are often the most unified test of knowledge examinations results in order to assess students on the same academic requirements and examinations conditions. However, there has always been a great disparity in some high school outputs of students that gain admission to colleges compared to others. As such, parents desire to enroll their children in such propitious school to ascertain the future studies of their children in a reputable school. In my opinion, the prompt that recommends all students in a nation should be required to study the same national curriculum is one I mostly disagree with for two reasons.
To begin with, the tenet of universities -where high school graduates hope to explore- is based on unity in diversification. In other words, the long existed culture of the colleges is to welcome students from diverse backgrounds and various exposures in the pursuit of a common goal towards the attainment of their college degrees and related ambitions. An attempt to mandate all high school students to operate under the same condition is incongruous to the expectations of colleges to welcome students of varying knowledge and notions of various academic and social discourse. For instance, college like Stanford, Harvard and MIT have long witnessed various students that once believed in their shrewdness based on their unmatched performances in high school. An institution like Stanford avail scholars from various institutions around the world discover that the amount of exposure you attain is proportionate to how much of an intellect a student think of him or herself. Consequently, students get challenged, collaborate, compete healthily in order to close the gap among themselves which would in turn bolster their intellectual prowess. Taking this academic diversification away and level of exposure will greatly reduce the academic disparity among various students and consequently the level of competition will not remain intense as previously encountered. Of course, such low level of competition will not be beneficial to students and not much of a difference would exist between colleges and high school competition intensity.
In furtherance, the recommendation to enforce the same national curriculum is a redundant one to say the least. Profoundly, national examinations like the West African Senior Secondary Certificate Examination, SAT, TOEFL, IELTS and many more all have their curriculum published for high school to use in grooming their students. As such, the high school are given the autonomy to come up with their didactic approaches to preparing students for the unified examinations using the examination curriculum as a basis. Trying to look into how and the approaches high school employ to enforce a national ones is gratuitous as it would be better off for all high school to self assess their students and come up with the best curriculum that will produce the best results in their students' populace. For example, the curriculum used in an urbane area for the test of English should be different from that used in a rustic area where students are struggling with writing and listening. Trying to place the school on the same standard is a total disregard for the differences in both school. As such, schools should be permitted to sync their curriculum based on their students' academic level.
Nevertheless, they have been noticeable difference in the results of some schools to other schools. Some schools always perform better than some schools. They may be a need to employ the curriculum used by such schools in other schools. But the reality is that schools that tend to perform are private institutions that are free will to come up with their own curriculum. Government or publicly owned schools that utilized unified curriculum often struggle with the results. Evidently, there is a need to encourage diversification and independence among all schools on the national level rather than enforcing an approach that have been long futile in creating substantial changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...tional unified examination results, the institutions admission examinations amongst others. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...igh school employ to enforce a national ones is gratuitous as it would be better off...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 109.0 58.6224719101 186% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3694.0 2235.4752809 165% => OK
No of words: 684.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40058479532 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.11403887952 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99540817949 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440058479532 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1145.7 704.065955056 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7188164755 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.076923077 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80769230769 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25539221362 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832692307681 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799460877756 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173088916452 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769406032656 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.