“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos

Essay topics:

“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Should a nation require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college? From my perspective of view, it is beneficial to share the same curriculum, because such unique schedule could not only promote pair competition between students, but also accelerate educational preparation and communication between faculty resources in different college. However, we also need to consider the possible detrimental results: it may lead to restrict with students' development and indolence of teachers for improving their teaching approach.

To start off, the unique curriculum could promote the fair play between different colleges, thus help student study and cultivate their talent. As education already becomes a significant role for people's career and the potential rank in the society, how to guarantee the basic fair in education is always a critical topic. However, the diversity of education resource, such as textbook, course content, etc., actually provide the potentials for guys who want to cheat during the education course and relevant test. If from the beginning, before entering college, if the nationwide course would be uniform and shared for different colleges, all of students would be given the same content and the relevant evaluation after their equal study could be more impartial and disinterested. Furthermore, guys who want to utilize some special materials for examination in the exam of their own region will definitely fail, as all of teaching resources are basically scheduled and given from one authority.

Moreover, teachers in different colleges could also enjoy the advantages brought about by the shared curriculum content. They could have a homogenous language and discussion topic during their preparation and communication with their teaching ideas. For years, we always blame the teaching unbalance between different district, and one of more effective way to ameliorate such problem is to accelerate communication between teachers in different regions. However, if their teaching contents and course resources are actually different from each other, even conflicting to some extents, our good will of removing the unbalance of teaching resources will definitely be in vain. Therefore, given the prerequisite that teachers are working on the same materials, they would have no potential barriers for communication with each other, which further help our goal.

Furthermore, when all of education fall into the same pattern, both students and colleges might suffer a potential risk: the natural distinction existing between students and colleges could be eliminated unfortunately, which might lead to their lack of further development and indolence of faculty's motivation. Undoubtedly, as colleges own different teaching resources and students differentiate with each other, both colleges and students possess the natural desire to cultivate their own advantages. But if students with special talents have to be forced to learn the same teaching materials as other, they might only spend relatively few time out of their talent and just stay at the same place as lack of further chance to get touch with more complex topic. The same case also applies for colleges. Let's imagine that the most eminent high school in America just use the same courses as the mediocre school, their teaching faculties might feel tedious for their normal work and gradually lose their enthusiasm for further challenge in further research of their teaching material and content. Therefore, from the diversity of students and colleges situation, it is necessary to provide additional teaching content and materials to fulfill student owning the special talent and teachers who possess the enthusiasm for further challenges. Otherwise, their precious capacity will be wasted unfortunately.

In summary, I partially give my approval for the suggestion that all of colleges should embrace the same education schedule, even parts of their teaching content and resource. However, considering the potential risk related with such seeming hidebound educational strategy, it is necessary for our strategy designer to deliberate how to avoid the aforementioned side effect and cultivate more animated environment for both students and colleges.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 804, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...he same case also applies for colleges. Lets imagine that the most eminent high scho...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in summary, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3648.0 2235.4752809 163% => OK
No of words: 648.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04537849152 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86540789666 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449074074074 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1137.6 704.065955056 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4386492331 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.818181818 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4545454545 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167129594806 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670494040381 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879104271192 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118038356252 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601239782997 0.0667264976115 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.1392134831 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 48.8420337079 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.