Education is the backbone of a nation. The policies should be framed and implemented vary prudently and cautiously. It is vital to study the repercussions of any policy before making it official. So is the case with the argument discussed by the author. Education is fundamental right guaranteed to an individual by the constitution of any nation. It is education which shapes the future of country. But educational policies have far more impact if they do not curb the liberty of the students. This is analyzed in the following paragraphs in detail.
For first, a country might host very diverse population. Depending on the race, ethnicity, culture and background, students might develop different interests. Students set their goals at very early stages of life, based on their interests. A study has shown that the people form different culture want their coming generations to learn values of their tradition. While if that perspective in not taken into consideration during implementing a generalized curriculum then, it may result into either schism of guardians into sect or will eventually lead to protests. One might even blame the government for gerrymandering.
Another perspective is the interest and the ability of the students. For proper functioning and prosperity of a nation, it needs a team of expertise that constitutes of doctors, engineers, lawyers, politicians, linguistics etc. But if all the students are forced in to the same gorge irrespective of their interests then the situation will result into mayhem. Consider, for example, a child who is physically strong and have keen interest in sport activities. If that child is forced to study something beyond his ability and interests, that will eventually lead to his failure. Not that it will be only his failure, the nation has failed him. He could have been a great sportsperson, who would have made his nation shine at global level.
The gist of this argument lies in scrutinizing the possibilities of how to get the best out the resources that a nation possesses in the form of young brains. One needs to develop tools and techniques for analyzing the consequences of a policy. It should be a win-win situation for both the students and the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lame the government for gerrymandering. Another perspective is the interest and ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...tion, it needs a team of expertise that constitutes of doctors, engineers, lawyers, politician...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12295081967 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00108100603 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8082671247 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.125 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04166666667 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195502210696 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484142194652 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510906472108 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109292343401 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341893008242 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.