While some wilderness area need to be utilized for our advancement, one should not neglect the bigger view : are economic gains of any value in a dystopian society with no wilderness area?
Earth is 4 billion years old and we are just 100,000 year old. Infact, we shouldn’t have no right to even decide this policy. Since, our strength and intelligent has made us so powerful we have the responsibility to decide for all species. Due to excessive green house gases as well as natural habitat encroachment most animals are on the verge of extinction. We, are the most advanced species in the planet and its our responsibility to make it a liveable place for all species. Law makers as representatives of all people should definitely pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness.
During the late 18th century the world leaders saw no harm in destroying “wild” ,setting up factories and setting up railway tracks in the name of Industrial revolution. While we may call the jungles and forests wild , they actually home to almost all land species. Damages have already been done in the last 200 years ; now we must do our best to mitigate this damage. However, promulgating a policy to preserve all wilderness area can have some negative consequences.
While it is always debatable whether forests should be destroyed for better connectivity and facilities, humans would never enter the industrial age with the view of preserving all areas in their natural state. Destroying of wilderness has a indirect relation to our advacement as human beings and species as a whole. Although it might have destroyed the animal’s natural habitat , the advancement has helped palentiologists learn better about the animals, the geologists to learn better about their natural habitat.
Although I almost espouse this policy, implementing it in totality can impede our progress. I do not agree with the dichomotous view of the policy. I’d definitely follow if this policy could be changed to “Nations should pass laws to preserve remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, but it can be uplifted if these areas can be utilized for the gain of the entire species.”
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...most advanced species in the planet and its our responsibility to make it a liveabl...
^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...w no harm in destroying 'wild' ,setting up factories and setting up rail...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...we may call the jungles and forests wild , they actually home to almost all land s...
^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ral state. Destroying of wilderness has a indirect relation to our advacement as ...
^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...troyed the animal's natural habitat , the advancement has helped palentiologi...
^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...cement has helped palentiologists learn better about the animals, the geologists to le...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ut the animals, the geologists to learn better about their natural habitat. Althou...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pos;Nations should pass laws to preserve remaining wilderness areas in their natu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1568627451 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03026834186 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563025210084 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5644206691 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.294117647 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288686649237 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855742541234 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102830565352 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177863289245 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879538824215 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.