This is a debatable topic whether the nation should make efforts to preserve the environment or not. Every nation gives more importance to the economic development over protecting the environment as the economic progress makes the country more developed. This progress should not be made at the cost of natural surroundings. I believe that country all over the world should make efforts to preserve ecology even at the cost of economic gain of the nation.
First and foremost, the environment plays an important role in the life-cycle of human beings. The food we eat or the clothes we wear we get it from the environment thus it is our responsibility to protect the ecology. We have exploited the nature to such an extent that there are shifts in weather all over the world, the glaciers are melting, the global temperature is rising. All the mentioned problems are result of human activities. Thus, it is our duty to preserve the wilderness areas in order to maintain the ecological balance. Recently the Paris Accord made by the developed countries to control the carbon emission is one of the major step taken to protect the environment. This is draining the countries economically but if we don't spend money now it may result in natural calamities due to ecological imbalance.
Besides this, humans are exploiting the natural reserves for their profit thus, policies made by the government will help to preserve them. In the absence of laws these activities cannot be controlled. The preservation of the wilderness will help to prevent the plants and animals who are on the verge of extinction. Also, such measures may result in economic gain as it will increase the tourism. People like to see and explore unique flora and fauna. For example, Indian forests are home to many plants and animals which are not found in any other places of the world thus, by protecting them will attract the tourists and researchers.
In conclusion, I agree with the author because of the reasons discussed above. In my opinion, the nature needs to be protected though at the cost of economic gain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ng the countries economically but if we dont spend money now it may result in natura...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93484419263 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72826447394 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535410764873 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2392132405 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6842105263 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265174281426 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724464258955 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059635723 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142185975512 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505692846611 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.