Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In times of economic stability, the value of the arts is rarely seen as superfluous. When money is readily available, the demand for the arts is readily met with government funding – in fact, artistic revolutions often flourished hand in hand with cultural and economic prosperity. However, times of fiscal depression are often just around the corner, and when they arrive, government funding may be stretched tightly. During these times, the government should suspend this funding – no matter arts’ inherent worth to culture – and supplant it with support for the hungry and struggling membe...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...edical care. In these situations, it is absolutely essential that artistic funding be placed on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2494.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46929824561 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90407849395 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535087719298 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5477582833 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.7 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157269343006 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521757935913 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463864686696 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994183009844 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534386603118 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.