In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays people spend their time to variety of issues such as art, history, science and so on. however, the extent states a noteworthy work of art should be understandable for most people. generally, in my point of view, I concur the statement and demonstrate my reasoning in the following.
First of all, since the extent considers any type of art work, and does not distinguish between either professional or amateur works, it is obvious that its fans are deferent. For example, if an art work is constructed for professional audiences, it is not important to be popular for most people. however, according to the extent, the audiences are most of people.
Secondly, we should search among people and find that what kind of art work will make them happy. Surely, they are hate such type of art works that do not look like meaningful for them. For example, if someone builds a science-fiction movie, teaching the general relativity of Einstein, it cannot be useful for all people and does not pay attention by most people.
Finally, we should go ahead with the knowledge of people. Current art works certainly are not understandable for people who lived many years ago. it has happened due to new technologies, open-minded sights and etc. Thus, the knowledge of people can determine what kind of the art should be constructed.
To sum up and conclude, I agree that art makers must pay attention to what they are building to be more familiar for most people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
...ould be understandable for most people. generally, in my point of view, I concur the stat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...mportant to be popular for most people. however, according to the extent, the audiences...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ording to the extent, the audiences are most of people. Secondly, we should search among ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...le for people who lived many years ago. it has happened due to new technologies, o...
^^
Line 13, column 207, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...to new technologies, open-minded sights and etc. Thus, the knowledge of people can deter...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to be more familiar for most people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, kind of, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.916 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79921417544 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2895457723 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.7857142857 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282364333829 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104746396331 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823536259264 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170733802602 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415263476232 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.