people rely on technology is good

Essay topics:

people rely on technology is good

There is no doubt with advent of new technologies people feel a more convenient lifstyle, however, the ability of human being has decreased. In my point of view, I agree the extent and believe relying on technology to solve our problems is not reliable.

First of all, if we rely on technology and solve our problems using it, during the time we will feel that we are barren and have not any interfere to deal with our problems. This will lead to a bad feeling and causes some problems in our spirit. For example, consider a person who goes to her/his office with a automatic car which has no driver. Psychologists have presented some disadvantages of using this type of technology.

Another reason that shows relying on technology is not suitable is that you may loos for example your money through a registration on websites. There are many spiders who wait for robbing using the internet. Thus, nowadays, stealing has become easier than before. This is an example of disadvantage of relying on technology.

As a last reason, the technology has extremely changed our lifestyle. In the past, we did exercise and play with our friend. However, these days children play computer games and so on. This has led a fake activity which is stressful and has no benefit. There are some reports that some children have encountered with some heart attacks.

In conclusion, although the technology has had some disadvantage, by controlling such problems we can enhance its advantages.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... person who goes to her/his office with a automatic car which has no driver. Psyc...
^
Line 17, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems we can enhance its advantages.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.976 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77877670927 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8362159693 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.75 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181721205417 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547764943885 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657275130694 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111189765534 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748593288461 0.0667264976115 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.