Some believe that in order to take risks, we should consider its consequences. Apparently when we talk about risks, the first thing comes to mind, is the consequences. Since being risky is about catastrophic lose or fabulous win. In other words, risk taking reminds us a concept of zero or one. Therefore there would not be any middle ground, and logically, people should be careful while taking risks. I mostly agree with this notion, and will elaborate my opinion in this essay.
First of all, being or not being a risk taker is a controversial concept. Psychologists believe that some people tend to take more risks In comparison with others who are known as conservatives. These differences might be due to different environment and methods of growing, as well as the chemistry of our brains and our genetic. They also assert that this trait can be determined via taking tests and observing the subjects. While I partly agree with these findings, I personally believe that humankind is a complicated creature and we might not be accurate in predicting our actions. For example, a conservative person might once take a risk without even considering that as a risk! Specially when the unforeseen circumstances come up and we have to decide rapidly. For instance, when a parent is observing his/her child to be attacked by a car, they might pull the kid and take themselves in danger instead of them. Therefore it may not be exact to put this concept in the formula.
Furthermore, taking risk has a nature of uncertainty embodied in itself and we might face some negative outcomes while doing so. Although every action has a state of uncertainty and the wholly certain decisions might not get us any where. The certain decisions usually have limited positive outcomes, which in long term might not be as good as the positive consequence of a risky decision, although risks might have devastating results.
Finally, Although scholars assert that risk takers have an instinct tendency toward taking risks and are not able to estimate the consequences of their actions perfectly. On the other hand, conservatives are naturally sensitive to danger, they can easily feel it and avoid doing harmful things during their lives. Thus the way of arguing about the consequences of an action with these two groups might be fundamentally different. But I think that both groups can use the advantage of consultants before making difficult and important decisions.
In conclusion, Despite the complexities of decision making among people, from my personal stand point, the estimation of the decision’s consequences is always possible to some extent, and we can make wise decisions by doing analysis before action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ng reminds us a concept of zero or one. Therefore there would not be any middle ground, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 921, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e themselves in danger instead of them. Therefore it may not be exact to put this concept...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...olly certain decisions might not get us any where. The certain decisions usually have lim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oing harmful things during their lives. Thus the way of arguing about the consequenc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09192825112 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85203644549 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3798829229 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.227272727 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31818181818 5.21951772744 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147677727414 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416856886606 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452530987485 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833508632774 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028895843587 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.