People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel

Essay topics:

People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Yes, the person who is deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it, as being deeply involved in the ideas they understand every aspect of it, which makes them more susceptible to the intricate details of what ever the matter may be. Knowledge plays an important role in being critical of anything. Any person who have the required knowledge of the field can be critical about but the most of the laymen don’t possess the adequate knowledge to be critical. Due to lack of adequate knowledge, it hinders the site of several important aspects of the thing you are critical about. An Astrophysicist is always more critical about the planets than an observer who do possess some knowledge but is nothing compared to the scintist.
For example, a Formula 1 car driver understands the intricate details of aerodynamic but as compared to laymen who just love to rush his car on empty roads, thus formula 1 driver will always be more critical of the cars aerodynamic performance than a laymen. Similarly, a person who is founder of huge company will understand the market trends better than a person who lives a ostentatious life and buys shares. Individuals who are committed to an idea or policy always tend to know better than anyone, because they are the creator of it, or they might have spent a huge chunk of theirs life time on that idea or policy. Great scientist had always had a habit of spending huge amount of time with their idea or policy which they advocate, this gives them the time to analysize it the policy’s or idea’s advantages or shortcomings which in most of the cases are not obvious to a layman or someone who is just enthusiastic about the thing.
A sports person playing a sport for half of his life will understand better than a commentrator or critique because he has spent the some huge amount of time in that real situation, with the real pressure to perform, this gives him the right to be critical about the game. Commenting on one’s performance by a critique can be accurate but it can’t be as precise as a player himself who had played that sport. Some people who have a lot of ill people around them or have been grown in an environment from which they can get a good knowledge or understanding of which medicine is to taken in what case doesn’t make him better than a doctor. The problem of Anti-biotic resistance is very prominent is the countries such as India where people can illicitly buy drugs from drug store without the doctors prescription, but this not making these people a substitute for a doctor. A doctors knows better and will be more critical about the smallest of the symptom which could make a huge difference between the treatments.
However, some people can be more critical about a few things with being derictly involved in that matter. For instance a tech enthusiast may perceive a new piece of tech in better way than an engineer, or maybe the enthusiast might have a better vision of the productions than a conventional engineer. There are several instances where such things can happen like for a stock broker who might be selling and buying stocks from a long time but a layman can be more critical of the stock tends who might have been following the industry trends from a longer period of time. This is where experience plays a big role, even though a person who might not be directly embroiled in the matter, but have a better know in term of overview of the matter with a huge experience can definitely be more critical than a newbie who could be advocating the idea for a while and finds hiomself directly involved in the matter.
At the end people will be more critical if they are involved in an idea or policy and will have the first and for most right to be, but I will have to concede that there can be instances where the opposite can also be possible. Even though a person who is just interested in a policy or idea can never overturn the critical ability of of a person who is deeply committed to it.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...f the cars aerodynamic performance than a laymen. Similarly, a person who is founder of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t trends better than a person who lives a ostentatious life and buys shares. Indi...
^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...might have spent a huge chunk of theirs life time on that idea or policy. Great scientist...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 662, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reat scientist had always had a habit of spending huge amount of time with their ...
^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...s just enthusiastic about the thing. A sports person playing a sport for half of his...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iastic about the thing. A sports person playing a sport for half of his life wil...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll understand better than a commentrator or critique because he has spent the som...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...r or critique because he has spent the some huge amount of time in that real situat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 890, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A doctor' or simply 'doctors'?
Suggestion: A doctor; Doctors
...these people a substitute for a doctor. A doctors knows better and will be more critical ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'know'.
Suggestion: know
...le a substitute for a doctor. A doctors knows better and will be more critical about ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l about a few things with being derictly involved in that matter. For instance a ...
^^
Line 4, column 557, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...owing the industry trends from a longer period of time. This is where experience plays a big r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...can never overturn the critical ability of of a person who is deeply committed to it....
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 31.0 11.3162921348 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3314.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 719.0 442.535393258 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60917941586 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.17824056563 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61514363807 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390820584145 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1067.4 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2622135006 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.7 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.95 23.4991977007 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211247692869 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806962542804 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548550354741 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145374703778 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534800207479 0.0667264976115 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.