People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In given issue prompt author tries to state the lure of people with the ideas to which they are committed. i somewhat agree with this optimistic statement of author. as, saint Thomas more said " An absolute idea is one of the rarest thing known to man" thus people who are most deeply committed to an idea are most critical of it. one has to stick firmly with his ideas to come up with optimal results.
One cogent reason of my belief comes from thinking , when we look at past, we can see a lot of thinker, inventor, committed people who were deeply focus on their idea. Albert Einstein, Graham Bell, Isaac Newton, Thomas Edison, these are inventor the first come to my mind. We all know that Before the invention of bulb, Edison tries his examination a hundred thousand times, but he never gave up. Because he committed an idea, and he is the most critical one to his own idea. In this manner these people are successful, the more critical their self the more success is on their work. Our generation has also many people who most deeply committed their idea like Steve Jobs, when we look at his career, he humbled over and over but he never quit to criticize himself. Now we all using these people invention, how much effort they showed in the past how much we know all of them.
As the great cosmologist like giordano bruno, galileo galilei were strongly firm on their vision that Earth is not a flat it is spherical instead Moreover, all these people was seen crazy in their time, most of them rejected by their society . despite of opposition of pop's and surrounding people of Italy, they never give up on their ideas, which veracity later on accepted by the world. In nutshell the one must be firm on the idea to which he committed.
There is another way to look at this too, some people may think that the more commitment to an idea and policy creates more unreliable person, like some of the politicians. When we look at them, most of them like to get more and more favor instead of criticism. However, these politicians are from the commitment, and far from the hard work, that is the reason they can not stand on criticism. Moreover, we can not agree that these people are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy, these are only representative of the some specific group, only a talker not a doer.
In order to sum up, i would like to underscore people are better off being critical with their ideas rather than taking them as complimentary. Dayan lovely said" Even in the midst of the storm, the sun is still shinning" likewise people must stay firmly with their ideas , even after antagonism of critics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
... the ideas to which they are committed. i somewhat agree with this optimistic sta...
^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...th this optimistic statement of author. as, saint Thomas more said ' An absol...
^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... reason of my belief comes from thinking , when we look at past, we can see a lot ...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thinker seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of thinkers'.
Suggestion: a lot of thinkers
...king , when we look at past, we can see a lot of thinker, inventor, committed people who were de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'focused', 'focussed'.
Suggestion: focused; focussed
...entor, committed people who were deeply focus on their idea. Albert Einstein, Graham ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., most of them rejected by their society . despite of opposition of pop's and...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Despite
...ost of them rejected by their society . despite of opposition of pop's and surroun...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cy creates more unreliable person, like some of the politicians. When we look at them, most...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 529, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...y, these are only representative of the some specific group, only a talker not a doe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lker not a doer. In order to sum up, i would like to underscore people are bet...
^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...people must stay firmly with their ideas , even after antagonism of critics. ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... , even after antagonism of critics.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'likewise', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'as to', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211786372007 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.134438305709 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0626151012891 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0810313075506 0.0497285424764 163% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0791896869245 0.0444667217837 178% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.114180478821 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0313075506446 0.0406280797675 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37705885105 2.79330140395 85% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294659300184 0.030933414821 95% => OK
Particles: 0.00920810313076 0.0016655270985 553% => OK
Determiners: 0.0920810313076 0.0997080785238 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128913443831 0.0249443105267 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0220994475138 0.0148568991511 149% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2664.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 478.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57322175732 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.267782426778 0.366273622748 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.165271966527 0.280924506359 59% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.125523012552 0.200843997647 62% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0794979079498 0.132149295362 60% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37705885105 2.79330140395 85% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 219.290929204 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491631799163 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.6383113055 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6259120648 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.674092028746 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.21349557522 230% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 40.4271966527 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.2125 1.64882698954 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454497523862 0.391690518653 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112104161619 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0669441430583 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520928078735 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129139281519 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181131635232 0.161403998019 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948223715066 0.0892212321368 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.303586155841 0.385218514788 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0514249765703 0.0692045440612 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308171329378 0.275328986314 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634135067392 0.0653680567796 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.