As we are looking the map of the world, there are two kinds of countries generally, the first one is the capitalisitic nation, while another is socialistic nation. Due to the development of history, they are different in various factors, the most significant diffrence is the goal of the politicians' chasing for, which we could determin them right or wrong. That is the capitalism chasing for the common ground and reasonable consensus, the socialism chasing for future ideals which seemly to be elusive.
So let's discuss their difference and importance in the specific countries.
Born in China, after cultivating for over 20 years in mainland, I have the view to explain our socialism which may be esoteric to foreign friends. Because of the confucious thoughts has manipulated Chinese for over 2000 years, which emphasize the people should be royal to their empero, Chinese people should have the only one to be the king. While after new China established for nearly 70 years, the namely king was replaced by the final target(communist ideal) as a method to assemble all the people to work hard together to build new China.Now the result is obvious in China that so many great archievements had got by Chinese people, hence the elsusive ideals works in China.
However, Chinese communist ideal, which purposing to obviate individualism, looks like fantastic even elusive, but te authority has particular plans to excute in progress. There are five-year developing plans in every five years in China which guide the people to work with an pellucid target efficiently.Thus China is developing gradually in every field of the world. That is why some ex-soviet country like Polland want to replicate Chinese development when they found this method works.
On the other hand, due to the two-pary or multi-party Governments construction, this elusive ideals would not attract the people who will vote in the election, especially in the developed countries. Candidates must show some realistic plans to people as the target to archive if they are on the stage of next Government. As we saw the President Obama, Trump , they all realized most of their promises after they won the elections.
In conclusion, we could not to determine which ideal is good or bad, this is not the topic of either black or white. In the countries where there is one party manage the Government, eluisve ideals like communist ideals would be better, but it also needs specific plans like five-year plan in China to work in parts.While in the two-parry or multiparty Governments, common ideals works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the goal of the politicians chasing for, which we could determin them right or wr...
^^
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... common ground and reasonable consensus, the socialism chasing for future ideals ...
^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...eals which seemly to be elusive. So lets discuss their difference and importance...
^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Now
...o work hard together to build new China.Now the result is obvious in China that so ...
^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ina which guide the people to work with an pellucid target efficiently.Thus China ...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ork with an pellucid target efficiently.Thus China is developing gradually in every ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ork with an pellucid target efficiently.Thus China is developing gradually in every ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt. As we saw the President Obama, Trump , they all realized most of their promise...
^^
Line 11, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...ive-year plan in China to work in parts.While in the two-parry or multiparty Governme...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10613207547 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80562361614 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9783296646 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2666666667 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109868835541 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415756252314 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050029063134 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553650598167 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435975480951 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.