Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the democratic society, a successful politician will not have political power without a significant agreement from the people. The only way to get acceptance from the people is tolerating opposing idea and seeking reasonable consensus. The prompt also addresses that pursuing common ground is preferable than pursuing elusive ideals. We cannot rule out all elusive ideals because they are difficult to comprehend. From my perspective, politicians should share a common ground with people, but we must also consider a politician's view carefully to discern a good from a bad one.
First of all, a politician should know how to compromise with the people. From the young age, everyone learned how to compromise with our parents in one way or another. For instance, a child agrees to clean the room in return for a TV time. The child wants something from the parents, therefore yields to the parents' term and does what the parents require first. When a politician addresses a law or policy that requires contributions from the people, he or she should listen to people's and provide a reasonable agreement. If the politician wants to increase tax to build a public school or hospital, one should make a promise that the money used for such purpose in order to serve the people. It is the meaning of compromise: to give in order to get what one wants.
Secondly, elusive ideals from intransigent politicians could go wrong if left inconsiderate. Take, for example, the military dictatorship Adolf Hitler went out of ordinary to pursue his own ideal: conquer the world. One might argue that he did it for his nation and got support from his own people. However, in the crisis of Germany economy, instead of pursuing common ground, cooperating with other nations, Fuhrer suppressed any opposing view and forced the nation into a war to achieve his own ambition. This backfires, where he killed himself under own his failure and the war devastated the entire nations and every nations follows his fascism. The reason for his defeat is because his elusive ideals serve only his purpose and cause harm to all others.
However, there are still exceptions where an elusive ideal with a justified cause thrives. One famous example is president Abraham Lincoln. He had a lofty goal, to bring equality to all human being. The goal at the contemporary time was objected by the majority of people, to free the slaves, who related directly to a person's possession and wealth. Nevertheless, his Emancipation Proclamation was proven to be a successful movement, because it promotes human rights -- a noble cause.
In conclusion, a politician should obviously reach a common ground and reasonable consensus with the people. But, elusive ideals should not always be seen as unreasonable, because a politician with a view of a bigger picture and a justified cause can change the society into a better civilization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the democratic society, a successful ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 523, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a politician' or simply 'politicians'?
Suggestion: a politician; politicians
... with people, but we must also consider a politicians view carefully to discern a good from a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly to discern a good from a bad one. First of all, a politician should know h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... give in order to get what one wants. Secondly, elusive ideals from intransige...
^^^^
Line 5, column 681, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... his fascism. The reason for his defeat is because his elusive ideals serve only his purpo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...purpose and cause harm to all others. However, there are still exceptions wher...
^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e the slaves, who related directly to a persons possession and wealth. Nevertheless, hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...motes human rights -- a noble cause. In conclusion, a politician should obvio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04375 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80257037351 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6880817931 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.84 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.56 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18035069068 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556818752164 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592601732134 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111418941749 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596100774076 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.