Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy
Fame is what each and every in the world dream of, but as with great powers comes the great responsibility similarly with amount of the fame a person earns comes the curtailment of his or her privacy. The interest of the people in someone’s private life is directly proportional to how much the person is famous. I personally sympathize with the famous people as they are always in the lime light and are always expected to keep up with the social conduct which made by a society, a small mistake and there will be criticism form all over the world questioning their moral values.
Right to privacy is a constitutional right which is provided to all the citizens of a country, so even the famous people expecting right to privacy is valid but as we know the beautiful the flower faster it will be plucked, today each and every celebrity has willingly expected that there will a breach to their privacy no matter what they do. They can just minimize the damage but cannot completely expurgate the fact that their privacy will be respected.
The reason behind the breaching of is human tendency of peeping into the life of more successful and famous people; also once as a person you have reached to a level of being called as celebrity you are looked upon as a role model in the society and there will times where your inputs or comments matter a lot to a particular section of the society. Today due to ever increasing influence of social media everyone is waiting for some kind of gossip and who can be a better subject for gossip than a celebrity. Today due to the increasing insensitivity; people are more interested in the wardrobe malfunction of Katrina Kaif then a bomb blast in Syria. There have been instances where a person’s personal life is subjected to the world just to stigmatize his or her image, the best example of this is India’s PM Narendra Modi where is disrupted marriage life is used as his capability to lead a country.
Right to privacy in this era is just a myth, with facebook and google monitoring your online activities and the mess up by the governments in protecting your biometrics and identities the personal of a common man is not personal any more than how can Virat Kohli, Deepika Padukon or even the leader of a nation Narendra Modi expects his or her life to be completely private. We are just click of a button from accessing their whatsapp chats or cloud account.
Along with public figures even the lay man should be expecting people to be interested in their private life and should be atleast ready to compromise with some breach of the privacy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'powers'' or 'power's'?
Suggestion: powers'; power's
...n the world dream of, but as with great powers comes the great responsibility similarl...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...all mistake and there will be criticism form all over the world questioning their mo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'time'
Suggestion: time
...ole model in the society and there will times where your inputs or comments matter a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, similarly, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66160520607 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64811829917 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48590021692 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.6553154255 60.3974514979 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.083333333 118.986275619 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4166666667 23.4991977007 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247471909244 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930604318036 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972265747416 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158804734175 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113268790993 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.