A true Musician is a person who produce the music of any his particular field of artistry- singing, playing an instrument, composing and so on- that enriches the mood and minds of his audiences. Music is such an art which has a strength of bringing the multitude flavors like joy, surprise, melancholy, love and so on in it's single piece. That is why the field of music is being lauded and followed by almost each and every individual person. The talents that produce such wonderful music gain the popularity based on their performances. In this contemporary tiring world, where people get energized by their favorite musicians, popularize them for the quality of their performances only. Even after their deaths, their peaces of art works remains immortal and are being lauded by their present and posterity. Hence, there is no need to wait for such adroit musicians to die to scale their talents.
The music is a piece of art that makes it's composer's name immortal. Even after decades the popularity of musicians who stole the heart of their followers do not get vanished. Take for example the popular artist Late. Manna Dey. The master pieces made by him were responsible for the Bollywood movies of his era to rule the cinema world of India. Despite the death of the mega music star who gifted master class music to the world, the talent of Manna Dey was known to the world during his contemporary days itself. This provides a significant example to as
The musicians are not the movie stars in most of the situations. There are singers who only bring out the single music pieces into the market. Today, the music market has so many competitors that, just by the popularity of particular musician we can say that his talent is immense. This is because in case of music, which is bound by particular rules and aspects to produce a piece of music, cant be partial to a particular person blindly. Take for example, the popular Hindusthani Shastriya Sangeeth Tabala artist Zakhir hussain. His extraordinary talents of bringing out the Taal and Sur of the music in the most fascinating manner made him popular all around the world rather than blind following. Hence such talents can be known without considering their popularity as the popularity itself says how much innate talent they got.
But some might argue regarding the new trend where the other music platform like rap musics and pop musics prevail in certain parts of the country and some of the 'pioneers' exist there are only by the blind following not by their talents. But, even though their popularity may not represent their actual talents, at the end of the day, the original musicians are emerged out as eccentric and outstanding musicians in the world of music.
In a nutshell, even though the fame of a particular person might obscure from one's point of view who determines to evaluate the talents of that musician, it may not be case in most of the cases. Good music, which is a piece of art can only be contrived using certain rules and regulations that is being followed from ages. Hence, this makes us, if we know such rules to evaluate the person's talent in a viable manner despite his/her huge popularity even when he is living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even after” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that makes its composers name immortal. Even after decades the popularity of musicians who...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his provides a significant example to as The musicians are not the movie stars in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nd aspects to produce a piece of music, cant be partial to a particular person blind...
^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar Hindusthani Shastriya Sangeeth Tabala artist Zakhir hussain. His extraordinary...
^^
Line 5, column 703, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... the world rather than blind following. Hence such talents can be known without consi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ail in certain parts of the country and some of the pioneers exist there are only by the bl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... a particular person might obscure from ones point of view who determines to evaluat...
^^^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
..., if we know such rules to evaluate the persons talent in a viable manner despite his/h...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 399, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a viable manner" with adverb for "viable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ch rules to evaluate the persons talent in a viable manner despite his/her huge popularity even wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2658.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78057553957 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50458148597 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478417266187 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7048873384 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95833333333 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173340069686 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567213992147 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348262210745 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110760297464 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372751659322 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.