Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
An arguement that has taken place between many people in different eras is whether the knowledge is something that is sought for itself or is just a way followed to satisfy the human needs. one side of this discussion will support the idea that the knowledge is needed for itself, taken as an evidence that whatever is accomplished by scientists or researchers will directly or indirectly benefit someone, even if this one is the researcher himself finding his pleasure doing research. In contrast, the other side of the discussion would argue that the general purpose of the science and research done by a humanbeing is to benefit the humankind, and there is no value of their work if it just goes without anyone grasping a benefit from it.
A reasonable person might see that the science is an accomplishment that is achieved only by humans because of their uniquness and singularity between all other kind of creatures, and that is something we are blessed with and have to use to appreciate that blessing, and given that, scientists and researchers are to make efforts to do their job regardless how benefeciary this is for people. However, we can argue that seeing there is some fields of science that has to be supported with more research to benefit few numbe of people that really need that. For example, there are rare diseases that kill people every year, if we are only to put the science and research to help the greatest number of people, such diseases will never be cured.
Furthermore, the vast number of different fields of science and research make it a must that some researches must be done in areas that benefit few number of people. we can see that people get obsessed with many diffrent things, also, the obsession of the scientists or researches might also be very different and we can't oblige them to make efforts in fields they are not interested in.
Finally, this discourse will probably never die and people will not come to a specific opinion.However, the thinking that science and research has to be done only in the fields that benefit the greatest number of people might seem somehow partisan and not giving freedom for scientists and researchers to do whatever they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
An arguement that has taken place betwee...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ay followed to satisfy the human needs. one side of this discussion will support th...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out anyone grasping a benefit from it. A reasonable person might see that the s...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...mething we are blessed with and have to use to appreciate that blessing, and given ...
^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some fields'?
Suggestion: there are some fields
...ople. However, we can argue that seeing there is some fields of science that has to be supported wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, such diseases will never be cured. Furthermore, the vast number of differen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...ches must be done in areas that benefit few number of people. we can see that people get o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...reas that benefit few number of people. we can see that people get obsessed with m...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hes might also be very different and we cant oblige them to make efforts in fields t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in fields they are not interested in. Finally, this discourse will probably ne...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ple will not come to a specific opinion.However, the thinking that science and researc...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not come to a specific opinion.However, the thinking that science and research h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, really, so, as to, for example, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81052631579 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64276045556 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463157894737 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 23.0359550562 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.5730371933 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.111111111 118.986275619 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.2222222222 23.4991977007 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.21951772744 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350577427705 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155264006163 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847339893027 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224755116944 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107602187006 0.0667264976115 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 14.1392134831 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.51 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 11.2143820225 168% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.