So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts.
Driving safety is a burning issue today, and it will get more prominence in future as the number of vehicles are constantly increasing with exponential rate. There is no other known mechanism whoch provide safety and adoptability as seat belts do, but still some individuals prefer their freedom and neglect the legal driving obligations. Even if they are aware to the dangers involved during driving. In my opinion any individual whether it be adult, children or elder, all should be legally bound to use seat belts. It does not just ensure safety of yourself, but also create a desciplin and orderliness in society.
The first reason that opposes the author's claim is, the world is full of uncertainities, and accidents can happen anytime, regardless of one's awareness of the dangers involved during driving. The awareness does not provide gaurentee to safety. There are many superficial and uncontrollable situations that can affect the driver and cause catastrophe. For instance, if driver saw a vehicle coming from the opposite direction, just followed by a 'U' shape turn, can cause put in distress, and cause a trouble. It can be a sudden rain-fall which makes the visuals hazy or may be an unexpected natuaral disaster like earthquake. No one can stay aware to the situations beyond their control and that is where seat-belt ensures the safety.
Aother reason, if something is not legally bounded, then it might cause people to take advantage of it. There is no way to know that an individual is aware of the dangers or not, so there no way to ensure that the people who are not bounded by the law to use seat-belts, are legally aware of dangers. If it already hard to ensure safety, even when there are strict obligations to use seat belts, how safe the roads will be without it.
Moreover, some poeple intentionally do not use seat belts, and later reasoned that, it is time consuming, or not comfertable. For instance, may be it is time consuming and not comfertable, but it can save an individual from a hell lot of time in hospitals and the discomfort caused by that visit. In addition, there will be saving of money. The seat belt act as an insurance policy, it is hard to keep up with obligations of it, but it can give huge benefits to individual and his family in the situation of disaster. The only difference is seat belt requires efforts to pay not the money.
In summation, the seat belt is not just to ensure the safety of an individual but the world around him as well, and if everyone understand this, there will be very less life threteaning cases. The seat belts are not measurement of driving awareness but the measure of safety, so reagrdless of one's understanding for awareness, the use of seat belt should be ligally obligated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creasing with exponential rate. There is no other known mechanism whoch provide s...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... neglect the legal driving obligations. Even if they are aware to the dangers involved ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...dents can happen anytime, regardless of ones awareness of the dangers involved durin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ming, or not comfertable. For instance, may be it is time consuming and not comfertabl...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...the measure of safety, so reagrdless of ones understanding for awareness, the use of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, well, for instance, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79079497908 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75493067761 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491631799163 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5453715758 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.047619048 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330978554393 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946084642887 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101123150423 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192695463169 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823898002097 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.