Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nature when left untouched, balances on its own and doesnot need external help to be in a state of equilibruim. In an ecosystem, different flora and fauna do go extinct but this process is a slow process and takes atleast thousand of years. The author states that we should only try to save those species who are going to be extinct because of human actions. I strongly disagree with this fact because of 3 reasons.
Almost all extinctions happening in recent times are a consequence of human activities. From the time humans started to build civilizations they have changed a lot of their surrounding enivornments. Farmers cleared large parcels of land for agriculture, mining for metals became a neccesity in process poisoning rivers, lakes and the soil. In recent times, when vulture population started to decline, no one had the idea why it was happening. It did not seem to be an effect of direct human action but after a decade of research it all became clear-- diclofenac , a painkiller given to farm animals was behind all this. Vultures were eating the carcasses of animals which had a huge quantity of diclofenac in them which led to their demise. Nearly all extinctions happening in after growth of human civilization is either a direct or an indirect effect of human activity.
If we donot make an effort to save all species (even those with no apparent human causation for their dwindling numbers) it would lead to a dominos effect on others. Ever organism on this planet is linked with each other and is co-dependent. Take for instance, in a forest the jaguar(predator) population is decreasing even without any apparent human reason behind this, it will lead to a temporary spike in deer(prey) population which will lead to overgrazing. The increased deer population will need more resources than the forest can provide sustainabily. After some time of this happening it would lead to the forest getting destroyed and the ecosytem of that particular area collapsing. By deciding not to save a species of animals whos decreasing numbers were not our fault we fail to appreciate their importance in the overall ecosytem.
Letting nature be on its own and not interfere with it seems like a good idea unless you take into account human beings historical and current impact on the planet. It is not plausible to see extinction of indivual species in isolation and not take responsibilty when we donot have a direct action leading to their extinction. As everyone, be it a plant , animal or a human in our planet are interlinked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not before or after that. For example, I no longer enjoy the cartoon tom and je...
^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e appeal produces lesser pieces of art. The prompt suggests for any work of art ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... a standing it should have a mass appeal . I do not think an art piece which doesn...
^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ink an art piece which doesn't have a massive fan following is a lesser piec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53470437018 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65028994978 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503856041131 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8948575566 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8421052632 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247677910865 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838960417805 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806793543183 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17436933079 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110615871509 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.