Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc

Airbus cooperation made by European countries, to compete with large aircraft manufacturer Boeing, is very eminent example of successful cooperation. The given statement compares cooperation with competition. The cooperation and healthy competition are always played an important role in triumph. Cooperation always helps to overcome shortcomings of each individual while healthy competition constantly motivates for betterment.

Firstly, the collaboration is always helpful for weaker individuals due to there inability to compete with strong players.
For an example, wealthy farmers can buy extravagant instruments for farming. Such instruments will help them to lower the cost of the crops. But, it is difficult for poor farmers who are unable to buy such expensive instruments. To confront with wealthy farmers, poor farmers need to form cooperation to buy such instruments. Similarly, in the case of small nations, it is also true. They formed World Trade Organization for regularizing world trade. Therefore, now world trade is unbiased for such small nations with limited resources.

Furthermore, cooperation also helps to achieve common goal because it increases strength and decreases weaknesses. There are various examples in space exploration field. For an instance, when Indian space agency planned Magalyan, mission to the mars, they got inputs about voyage to the mars from all the space agencies from all over the world such as NASA. It helped them while planning and execution of the mission.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 227.0 442.535393258 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75330396476 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00101220415 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0459490869 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.625 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1875 23.4991977007 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0551491772749 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216863444989 0.0831039109588 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211596952339 0.0758088955206 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0343832839188 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218046780572 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.