Art is considered to be one of the aesthetic outcome of highly specialized experts like artists, sculptors, craftsman, intricate designers, painters, musicians, Art directors, creative team etc. An artless life is like a desolated place with no one to inhabit. Though, it is the responsibility of the government to fund these artists and make them flourish, there are many loopholes in the system in which the funds are mishandled by influential people of the society. Yet, government can profess a definitive rules and regulations to fund the appropriate people.
Most of the countries in the world are democratic while a very few are monarchic. In a big democratic nation like India, the channel through which the funds are directed to the artists can remain intrusive in most of the cases. Since, there are many ministries and sub-ministries involved in channelizing the funds to the needy, there is always a tint of venality prevailing in each department. Also there are chances for people with high recommendations to interrupt the source and act obsequious to avail the funds for unnecessary personal agendas. This in turn can surely threaten the integrity of arts. It is likely to affect the highly skilled people to miss many opportunities to thrive in their field.
The highly skilled artists who are supposed to receive the funds are confined to a situation where they are neither recognized nor encouraged to exhibit their skills properly. There must be a direct connection between the government and the artists like in the pre democratic era. During the monarchy, countries worldwide flourished extraordinarily in arts and architecture. Kingship was such that the artistical prodigies were identified and funds were well articulated in those centuries. The masterpiece of such artists are those that we awe today. Be it paintings from Picasso or symphony from Beethoven, Mozart, Architectural accomplishments from various countries are nowadays exalted as the wonders of the world. Yet, we are unable to achieve such a culmination in arts and architecture today with advancement of technology in every field.
Government must have a close association with artists in order to flourish the artistry once again. Proper system must be initiated by the ministry of Arts and Architecture to loyally handover the funds to required artists. A nation's culture and heritage is highly reflected in the artistic skill the artists posses. As there are inadequacy in the law to protect these skillful masterminds, government must start to formulate certain ways to reach to these people for showcasing their excellency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntricate designers, painters, musicians, Art directors, creative team etc. An art...
^^
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...venality prevailing in each department. Also there are chances for people with high ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ndover the funds to required artists. A nations culture and heritage is highly reflecte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29016786571 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06886795605 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3367345634 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.047619048 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.19047619048 5.21951772744 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283505387565 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756917163926 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603003836986 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177981272898 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585962275469 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.