Arts is a cultural expression from a society that is very important to be developed. Artists and their movements need to be funded in a certain way to continue developing their ideas. Government funding is one option, however there is people who supports this possibility and other ones that disagree. Even considering some negative aspects that could be related to government funding of artistic movements, there is much more positive points that supports this possibility.
It’s possible that someone could argue that government cannot fund artists to develop their works. This kind of professionals are considered people that need to be independent from all sorts of strings, since they develop a work that in many occasions is very important to demonstrate social problems and dilemmas within a society, which might require to make critics against government. In this sense, if an artist is sponsored by the government itself, it might be more difficult to have this freedom to go against the ideas from politicians. For instance, many painters sponsored by the absolutist king Louis XVI from France were funded in order to paint representations of the grandiosity of the monarchy regime while at the same moment people in the streets of France were starving. In this context, these artists would never create works that could go against the idea of the regime while other artists not attached to the monarchy were able to represent the ideas that society had about the government.
Even considering the example from above, one cannot ignore the importance of government funding artistic expression within a society. Arts were always considered a field only available to be appreciated by what could be considered the “elite” from a certain a society. In this sense, many people would not have access to this kind of cultural expressions. In democratic regimes, the government was important to make these types of movements more available to people that didn’t have conditions to pay to see a painting exhibition, for example. Moreover, take the example of public libraries. These places are also a way to develop arts in a certain nation and they are funded by government. Libraries are very important to develop a critical thought and the public one allows everybody to have access to a series of contents. In this context, government make arts something more popular to people that is not able to buy books and trough this way government did not threatens the development of arts but actually helps spread arts knowledge trough society.
In conclusion, even considering that many people could see negative aspects in governments funding artistic movements, it’s possible to observe many positive elements in this action. When we consider that government is made by the people and for the people, we can also consider that is an obligation of it to improves knowledge that society has about arts movements by helping make these movements more accessible to everybody. In this sense, democratic regime has this responsibility and cannot interfere in these artistic expressions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...s within a society, which might require to make critics against government. In this sen...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 982, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'threaten'
Suggestion: threaten
... and trough this way government did not threatens the development of arts but actually he...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24649298597 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89436901214 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416833667335 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7878319117 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.9 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.95 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244658089527 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835053488609 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580774791316 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175229825561 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553390729216 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.