Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write

Art was always one of the crutial part of society in all the times. Some artists were forgotten, some of them were investigated just few years ago and get more valuability then during their lifetime. Moreover, a lot of artists were struggeling becasue of the lack of finances, and may be, if they had have enough funding avaliable in their time their talent would be aggrandize and they would be able to make a lot of wonderful art works. In other words, the proper funding, especially from government, is important for florishing the artistic armosphere and for making art more avaliable for people.

Some people beieve that providing funding for artist government can control the artist’s styles and threaten the integrity of the arts. However, the funding may be orintated to opening new art ptograms in schools and programs for children. In this case, the goverment funding can help children to gain acces to art programs and inforce thier awareness of artistic part of sociaty life. The programs oriantated to the development of artistic skills, craftmanship, dedication is crutial for a child development as a social person. Currently, some programs in art only in exclusive private schools and public schools cut the visual art due to the lack of funding.

Secondly, It could be said that centuries ago artist didn’t get any financation from government and they were florish because of the private aristocracy. That the government could limit the creativity and the self-expression. However, a lot of fameous painers were funded by either individuals or organizations. The Mona Lisa by Leonardo da vinci didn’t not have any less brilliance due tot the fact that it was a commission project.

In addition, There are a prelivance of the public art galaries in comparison with the private ones. In other words, the government funding orianteted to the construction and opening a new places for art performancies or excibitions make government a crutial participant in increasing awareness among the citizens and developing the artistic atmosphere. On the other hand, the lack of financiation usually leads to the shuting down of the art galaries and the the selling of the famous painting to the private collaction.

In some countries the government funding may not be as much as financetion from the private sector, but it’s important to notice that the government politics to allot money to the ameliaration of the art area is more important forward-thinking scale.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ck of finances, and may be, if they had have enough funding avaliable in their time ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for people. Some people beieve that providing funding for artist government ...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...d to the construction and opening a new places for art performancies or excibitions ma...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...he shuting down of the art galaries and the the selling of the famous painting to the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...he shuting down of the art galaries and the the selling of the famous painting to the p...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19801980198 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03358322672 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49504950495 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7948540991 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.529411765 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339089020926 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110831733277 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693006328472 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192911937037 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650186112975 0.0667264976115 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.