Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are

In the given statement author has stated that it would be hard for those living in the developed countries to reduce their energy consumption as well as leading a more sustainable lifestyle. And it is believed that such changes would have no guaranteed result. No one can predict weather this changes would be profitable or not. Author's apprehension is valid but as per what i think, such changes would definitely give a good result.

First of all, world wide energy consumption is increased as the number of living beings is increased. People's living standard is gone one step up, transportation technology has shown its touch sky position. It is definite that the energy usage will increase. But by doing so we have harmed our climate at some extent. Global warming is happening and emission of green house gases like CO2,CO,Ammonia etc is increased. Such gases are absorbing more heat than usual as per their properties and increasing earth temperature every year. And due to that the ice at the north and south pole is melting; Ocean water surface level is increasing. As per the reports in next 5 decades many beautiful islands of Maldivas are supposed to sink down under the sea if such warming continues. And it is not that people living in developed country are unable to do anything. Developed countries are definitely to have advance transportation system. They can use the other mode of transportation. Tree plantation, nurturing of existing nature is also a positive solution of that. If they can not change their life style; they should go for other good alternatives.

Solar energy, wind energy and other non conventional energy sources are also their. Developed countries can switch their attention towards such energy sources so that fossil fuel burning powered energy can be used less. That will help in saving the environment; stopping it from getting worse. And such methods will not even affect the life style. Developed countries like USA,Australia are increasing the use of sophisticated energies. It would be proven healthy for the health of our mother nature.

Such changes may effect the living standard but there are very less possibilities that they will harm our climate. They may not be proven efficient but probability of getting harmed is near about zero. If we turn towards this new approach our next generation would be thankful to us for the beautiful nature gift we are giving them.

In conclusion, it may be possible that the changes are unwarranted but for the climate it would never be acrid. It is important to save the climate and for that we should sacrifice whatever it takes. And developed countries should take chance first since the countries of second and third world are facing other crices.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s apprehension is valid but as per what i think, such changes would definitely gi...
^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ly give a good result. First of all, world wide energy consumption is increased as the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ly give a good result. First of all, world wide energy consumption is increased as the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Ammonia
...mission of green house gases like CO2,CO,Ammonia etc is increased. Such gases are absorb...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Australia
...life style. Developed countries like USA,Australia are increasing the use of sophisticated...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... our mother nature. Such changes may effect the living standard but there are very ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun possibilities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the living standard but there are very less possibilities that they will harm our c...
^^^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies of second and third world are facing other crices.
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'first of all']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243027888446 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.191235059761 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107569721116 0.0880659088768 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398406374502 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0617529880478 0.0444667217837 139% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.105577689243 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0717131474104 0.0406280797675 177% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72247278924 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0139442231076 0.030933414821 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00199203187251 0.0016655270985 120% => OK
Determiners: 0.0617529880478 0.0997080785238 62% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0438247011952 0.0249443105267 176% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00597609561753 0.0148568991511 40% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2749.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 458.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00218340611 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355895196507 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251091703057 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168122270742 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131004366812 0.132149295362 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72247278924 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526200873362 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 61.4772036325 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6194690265 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.7931034483 23.380412469 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.739749894 59.4972553346 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7931034483 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7931034483 23.380412469 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.448275862069 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 40.902273754 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.43537414966 1.64882698954 87% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38211565881 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0967301927341 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0728547881359 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.409572027368 0.547984918172 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129167816754 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111482644731 0.161403998019 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732328802169 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.26667322097 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0433425445933 0.0692045440612 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237431529053 0.275328986314 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057796440779 0.0653680567796 88% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.4325221239 163% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.