Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently

By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the features of effective leaders. Some people are in the conviction that political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another side embracing the view that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. I am of the latter opinion, supporting that because precise information about all respects of a country does not exist in public; moreover, each country translates to a complex system. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that effective leaders always try to find some ways to communicate their people to understand people’s opinion.

The first salient aspect to be introduced is that exact information about all the nation’s respects is not available for the public. A society is a set of people who have unique expertise in their job; so that, any information is not useful for many people in these societies. For example, some detail data about the number of published journal paper are not important for a soccer player because he has not any insight about various journals, scientific papers and etc. therefore, the leader must gathering some people in various knowledge to help him for flourish all the social aspects.

Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that the complex world is caused to prevent leaders to support all the people’s opinion. Nowadays, in each society, when the population is growing two dilemmas are emerged for prevents leader to yield to public opinion. The first dilemma is that the leader cannot speak to all people and hear all the opinions because it’s a time-consuming activity. The second reason is about people ideas are growth by increasing the population and applying all ideas are a hard and complex manner. Thus, in this time, a leader must remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives because it’s the easier way than yielding to all the public opinion.

In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The pieces of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, are that effective leaders usually try to hear their people’s insight into participating them in an evolving society. Of course, each leader must try to consider all the people’s insight because it works as a catalyst for developing the society powerful. There are some experts within people that can point out powerful and suitable ideas. The leader can gather some experts in each profession and enforced them to gather ideas from peoples in their vocation.

From what was already mentioned, I firmly believe that it is more rational to the leaders remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only precise information about all respects of a country do not exist in public, but also each country translate to a complex system. However, one should pay attention to the fact that effective leaders always try to find some ways to communicate their people to understand people’s opinion. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice to this.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...out various journals, scientific papers and etc. therefore, the leader must gathering so...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, of course, as a matter of fact, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2974.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20840630473 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86873809072 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469352014011 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 950.4 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1335085849 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.304347826 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8260869565 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78260869565 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40749256966 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123574509071 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109224937275 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232942136461 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968112175069 0.0667264976115 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.