Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently

A leader should show integrity, honesty, passion, commitment, and accountability towards his principles and moral values to become successful. A leader must also possess adaptability, decision-making sill, and problem-solving skills to become effective. These all traits are required for a leader tobecome more effective. The given statement discusses about two schools of thoughts. One talks about adherence to principle while other supports results of the leader. Political leader must adhere to moral values for increase his accountability and to inspire others while to deal with some arduous problem they should make some compromise.

Firstly, a leader must serve the people by solving their problems. If the task requires abondoning his moral values, he should do that. If he is dealing with some stress situation such as war, hijack, he needs to comprise with his moral values. People loves such people who are result-oriented. Sometimes, a good leader makes comprimise with other party with opposite ideology, to complete his tasks. To deal with problems related foreign relations, world trade and world peace requires adaptablity. Barak Obama made Iran deal going against his moral values. He made such decision for world peace. Hence, for surving the purpose and for decision making, leaders have to make comprimises.

Furthermore, a leader must show integrity and honesty towards his promises made to the people. He must be commited and passionate about his work. This will make him effective and it will inspire others to support him. Putin made promise to russian people about improving his economy and he stood by it. He finally delivered results. This inspired lots of peolpe in eastern europe. Therefore it is important to show commitment in the direcection on the cause for a leader to gain public support.

In conclusion, leaders should make adjustment to solve difficult problems which are impossible to solve with adhereing to his principles. Leader's integrity, honesty, and comimitment makes him an effective leader.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... moral values. People loves such people who are result-oriented. Sometimes, a good lead...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ired lots of peolpe in eastern europe. Therefore it is important to show commitment in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o gain public support. In conclusion, leaders should make adjustment to solve ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44968553459 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86613268806 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2559808241 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.2083333333 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.25 23.4991977007 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22420673676 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710319888881 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608552467925 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150792178648 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479118739254 0.0667264976115 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.44 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.