Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
We live in the 21st century. The world is running behind money and comforts. It is easy to get caught in the rat race and go with the principles of the society. Thinking independently to create models of our own futures can be a demanding task. Education is something that shapes a students life. The things that children learn in the classroom, stay with them throughout their lives. Todays schools are more inclined towards a logical education, more than moral education and our society is far from perfect. I believe education should be wholesome and there is a need for both moral education and logical reasoning for the overall development of a child with morality as the base of education.
In the ancient Indian education system or the Gurukula system, value education is symbolised by the roots of a tree and logical reasoning to be the stem. Both are equally important in its own perspectives and this type of education is considered as one of the best forms of it. In today's world, there are a lot of obstacles that one might encounter through their courses of life. Dealing with these obstacles can be difficult, logical reasoning might not be sufficient enough to get them through these situations. Take the case of a thief who stole food because he had no money to help feed his family. If logical education was to come into play, it doesn't have to deal with the emotional part of it and a crime will be treated as a crime. But this might not be the best decision to take and this is when moral values come into play. Sometimes it is best to be kind and humane rather than taking logical decisions. So definitely a moral society cannot be formed by giving the foundation of education as logical reasoning.
A society needs to live in peace and harmony and that is what ultimately leads to a prosperous nation. Without moral education being the base of the system, I believe a moral society can never flourish. Some might argue that the world is getting more and more difficult to live in and competent, so more time should be given to logical reasoning than morality. The case is true that the world demands more knowledgeable people with industrial skills more than ever. But there is a lot more than just industrial skills, it should have a balance. Leading a family and continuing the human race need values to be followed. Logic will not help a person when he is in a state of depression.
Rounding up the points and shedding light on the wholesome development of students, with strong conviction, I believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education and logical reasoning should be built upon these morales. To be a good human being, you need not be a logical expert, and he world does not need logical experts who are not humane beings. So I align with the position the teaching morality as the foundation and logical reasoning on top of that is the best way to create wholesome individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...k. Education is something that shapes a students life. The things that children learn in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cal education was to come into play, it doesnt have to deal with the emotional part of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as to, on the whole, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68278529981 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61526729604 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442940038685 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7739548372 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1481481481 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338048946014 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846995143411 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929442124422 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229055644998 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734384052663 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.