Teacher's salary should be based on their student's academic performance.
The writer contends that the Teachers should be paid according to their student's academic performance. I agree that an individual shoud be paid as per his performance in his work, however this is very complex case to say so. As we know that, even the childrens from the same mother and father have different catching capacity, even if a teacher teaches well in a class, the student's academic performance may varies. Classroom often filled with variety of students, different people, different capacity, so I think the writer's contention is unjust.
First of all, a classroom contain variety of students, few are very wetty, shrewd, and few are relatively slow and dull. In such case, when a class is filled with shrewd and perceptive student, it is possible that their academic performance is of high standard. However, what if the class is furnished with dull, unimaginative, lazy students? Even when there is a very good teacher, the academic performance of the students might not be good. Lazyness is entrenched in a person's personality, no teacher can completely reverse any individual's inherent habit. In this case it is a grave mistake to agree with the author's contention. For instance, when I was in high- school, we had three sections, section A where students were of high quality, section B where students were of low perceptive quallity, additionally they bit lazy, and section C, where students were of undisciplined and lazy. In secton A, even if the teacher don't teach well, our friends used to get very good grades while in other rest sections, despite teacher's great effort, relatively they never get good academic grades. So I don't agree with the writer's claim.
Second of all, there is a huge possibililty that in order to show good academic performance, teacher may degrade their standard of grades. If we do according to the contention above, it can be counterproductive in this way. For example, suppose we implemented this contention in a school in our town. After this, in order to get high pay, teachers are motivated to give high grades to a student even when he or she doesn't deserve such high grade. Consequently, the overall quality of education reduced. Ultimately, after few years the value of academic grades will diminishes.
Third of all, it is not certain that teacher will become more industrious when they paid high and the quality of education will rise up. Additionally, if this contention is implemented, the race for giving high grades for their students will begin, the ethical teacher will be overshowed and discouraged however, the unethical, fradulent teacher will motivated. This will creat a great hole in overall education system.
In sum, the writer's contention sounds great, but in practical manner it has huge counterproductive consequnces. In the case of teaching learnign activities, it might be grave mistake to think in this way. Because of the above possible consequences it may produce, I totally disagree with the writer's contention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 519, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ple, different capacity, so I think the writers contention is unjust. First of all,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ot be good. Lazyness is entrenched in a persons personality, no teacher can completely ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...it is a grave mistake to agree with the authors contention. For instance, when I was in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 925, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... lazy. In secton A, even if the teacher dont teach well, our friends used to get ver...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1097, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey never get good academic grades. So I dont agree with the writers claim. Second...
^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do according to the contention above, it can be counterproductive in this way. Fo...
^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...grades to a student even when he or she doesnt deserve such high grade. Consequently, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...years the value of academic grades will diminishes. Third of all, it is not certain th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'motivate'
Suggestion: motivate
..., the unethical, fradulent teacher will motivated. This will creat a great hole in overal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...verall education system. In sum, the writers contention sounds great, but in practic...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaching learnign activities, it might be grave mistake to think in this way. Beca...
^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ay produce, I totally disagree with the writers contention.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2511.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09330628803 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9104882878 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478701825558 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4564581343 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.44 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.72 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290396430499 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825168132436 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10513161154 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159727358142 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865071826981 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.