The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below illustrates European trend in consuming fish, chicken, beef, and lamb from 1979 to 2004. It can be obviously seen the different trend among them and which meat is the most popular in European country in the end of 2004.

After 1979, fish consumption fluctuated until 2004. Lamb consumption declined sharply from 1979 until around 1981. From then onwards, it fluctuated until 2004, but the general trend was downwards. On the contrary, even though chicken consumption fluctuated, its trend was generally upwards till 2004. Beef consumption fell dramatically around period 1979 and 1981. Then, it recovered in 1983. Then, towards 2004, the beef consumption fluctuated, yet the general trend was sharply downwards.

From above, it can be clearly seen that fish consumption was stable to become the most avoided in Europe even until 2004. In contrast, chicken was the most favorite in Europe in the end of period.

In conclusion, the figure below shows the different trend between fish and other meat from 1979 to 2004 among European. Besides, chicken is the most favorite in the end of 2004.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (9 votes)

Comments

flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.69 7.5

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 181 200
No. of Characters: 892 1000
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.668 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.928 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.47 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.69 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.436 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.622 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4