The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in
Britain. The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The given graphs compare the amount of money(in pence) spent by a person on a weekly basis on the purchase of fast foods(hamburgers, fish and chips, and pizza) studied under three income groups( high, average, and low) along with their consumption trend over a period of three decades starting from 1970 in Britain.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the majority of high and average income Britishers consumed hamburgers, while in the low-income group people preferred fish and chips. Also, over the period as a whole, hamburgers led the chart followed next by pizza. However, fish and chips experienced significant downfall.
According to the given illustration, more than 40 pence were spent by the first group on the hamburgers compared to just 33 and 14 pence by the average and the low salaried group. Also, the average group invested nearly one-fourth on fish and chips, up by 5 pence than the other groups. In addition, whilst the highest salaried group spent nearly 20 pence on pizza, merely half of that was invested by the other two groups.
Turning to the trends, although fish and chips stood at the top rank (300 grams) in 1970, the same witnessed a sharp plummet in 15 year period before rising to 230 grams by the period end. On the contrary, hamburger, and pizza started with the least value, however, the former went up dramatically by more than five times(550grams), followed by the latter to reach 280 grams just above the fish and chips' value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a started with the least value, however, the former went up dramatically by more ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88976377953 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57463458718 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4846922835 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.060044024451 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235047453399 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043892778569 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440401074 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580988070979 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.