The given bar graph compares the total time spend by boys and girls in a school in the UK on two different activities, namely chatting, and games console.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that although the highest proportion of children like to play games over chat, boys led the chart in this context.
According to the given illustration, nearly 85% of the boys work on a games console. Of those, whilst 3 in every 10 boys spend less than an hour, 45% spend 1 to 3 hours, and merely 10% play for more than four hours. On the contrary, out of 55% of boys who love chatting online, nearly a quarter each play for less than an hour and between 1 to 3 hours respectively. However, just 5% of total engage in chatting for more than 4 hours.
Turning to girls, close to 70% favor chat over 50% who play games. Also, nearly half of the total converse online for 1 to 3 hours as against a quarter for less than an hour, and only 8% for more than 4 hours. Among game lovers, the majority of 35% spend less than an hour, 13% for 1 to 3 hours, and just 2% for more than 4 hours. However, in all, games attract more children than chat.
- A bar graph on time 16 to 24 year olds spent per week on sports and exercise by gender in England 84
- The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles traveled PMT by transportation type in 2002 73
- The line graph shows changes in the per capita consumption of beef pork broilers and turkey in the United States between 1955 and 2012 78
- The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in the year 1999 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32727272727 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30188568047 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518181818182 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6393897592 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172621619274 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824646861978 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419874914752 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122500873358 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238358017162 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.