The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where

Essay topics:

The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph illustrates, the amount of money per kilometer on imported cloths in to European Union from six countries such as Argentina, Brazil, Japan, India, China, and Bangladesh in 1993 and 2003. Units are measured in pounds.

Overall, the most significant country of importing cloths to EU was Argentina, and the least number accounts for Bangladesh over the given period. Moreover, the considerable growth of cloths importing was by China among given countries after 10 years, whereas, importing from Brazil remained constant in both years.

The average price per clothing from Argentina and Japan was decreased after ten years such as, in 1993 which is 28 pound and 15 pound in kilometer while, in 2003 which is 25 pounds and 13 pounds per kilometer respectively.

Regarding importing cloths from China, India and Bangladesh account for relatively highest number of imported cloths in 2003 than 1993. China makes up cloths import from 10 pounds to more than 15 pounds per kilometer in 2003. While, cloths imported to EU from India has approximately seven pounds per kilometer in 1993 which increased to over 10 pounds per kilometer by 2003. Similarly, Bangladesh has considerably lowest imports to EU among other given countries which is less than five pounds per km in 1993 and 7 pounds per kilometer by 2003.

Votes
Average: 8 (15 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mporting cloths to EU was Argentina, and the least number accounts for Bangladesh...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: LEAST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'least numb'?
Suggestion: least numb
...ng cloths to EU was Argentina, and the least number accounts for Bangladesh over the given ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... ten years such as, in 1993 which is 28 pound and 15 pound in kilometer while, in 200...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...ch as, in 1993 which is 28 pound and 15 pound in kilometer while, in 2003 which is 25...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'relatively the highest'.
Suggestion: relatively the highest
...China, India and Bangladesh account for relatively highest number of imported cloths in 2003 than ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e than 15 pounds per kilometer in 2003. While, cloths imported to EU from India has a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considerably the lowest'.
Suggestion: considerably the lowest
...eter by 2003. Similarly, Bangladesh has considerably lowest imports to EU among other given countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, similarly, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1198156682 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65799964128 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493087557604 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.538467566 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256582450548 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133877544399 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719566908045 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178059700862 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596737946622 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.