The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005.

The bar graph illustrates the estimated proportion of automobile trips distinguished by its purpose and the sex of the drivers in 2005.

As a general trend, running cars for work was the most popular reason for both the genders. It is interesting to note that while majority of the male population drove cars for recreation, Women, on the other hand used cars for shopping.

With regards to work, men constituted just over 50% far higher than women at 39%. In relation to shopping, women had a higher standing at about 18% as opposed to men at 10%. In a sharp contrast, the usage of cars for recreation by men was at around 11% when compared to women at approximately 3%. Men were found to be at 8% a tad lower, in terms of courses as opposed to women at 12%.

For visiting banks and running errands, women struck higher at 9% and 10% respectively, whereas men were half as that of their counterparts in both areas. Women maintained their dominance in visiting friends at the rate of 8% while men were at just about 5%. Men overtook women when it came to visiting towns and were around 9% in comparison to women at 2%, the lowest figure in totality.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...9%. In relation to shopping, women had a higher standing at about 18% as opposed ...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... higher standing at about 18% as opposed to men at 10%. In a sharp contrast, the ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 2%, the lowest figure in totality.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, of course, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58373205742 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62871527529 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7768036679 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.8 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0755388990154 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416995806646 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788215383837 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879955946681 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106741578906 0.0819641961636 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.