The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of time that teenagers spent each week doing 7 types of activities over 6 years, from 2002 to 2007, in Chester.
Overall, the most time-consuming activity was watching television over all years, which varied from 25 to almost 40 hours per week. As opposite, bowling was the least popular activity each year: teenagers spent less than 5 hours weekly for this activity.
Such activities as going to pubs or discos, watching television and shopping steadily grew in popularity over years, resulted in about 2-3 times increase (from 5 to about 17 hours, from 25 to nearly 40 hours, from 7 to 15 hours respectively). Whereas, teenagers spent less time doing homework and sports with each year. In this case, the bar chart demonstrates a decrease from 12 to about 6 hours and from 10 to 2 hours.
The mentioned above trend was not spotted in an activity of watching DVDs. With the peak in 2004 (about 17 hours per week), teenagers spent just 10 hours in the final year, which is approximately equal to the time spent in the first year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al to the time spent in the first year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73262032086 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58072229067 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.305160322 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338176329727 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180444626593 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103986694268 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24275881279 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105828656022 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.