The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarized the information alby selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given bar chart depicts the frequency of males and females those who doing health task over the period of 2010 in the Australia. The figure showed distinctive age factors.
Overall, apart from one age group( young one) the females proportion more did exercise daily in their life than males.However, the equal involvement showed by both genders into elderly group. While, the girls an experienced the least amount of doing physical activity under the age 15 -24.
It is lucid that the two age groups which both genders showed equally did exercise or was lower girls than boys. Almost a half involment an experienced by both genders into 65 and over age group. While, this was the only one age group which was carried out 5.1% more males doing exercise around(52.8%) as compared to girls around(47.7%).
Regarding, adolescent groups whereby the females, around 6.7% greater involved doing health maintain task was made by amongst girls(48.9%) than boys (42.2%). Likewise, the age group 35-44 which 13% more girls did physical task in comparison to boys (52.5 and 39.5 respectively). In same pattern followed by females group 45to 54 and 55 to65 which was the girls did health activity almost equal under both age group 53% as opposed to boys around 43%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...exercise daily in their life than males.However, the equal involvement showed by both g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...wed by both genders into elderly group. While, the girls an experienced the least amo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, regarding, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97142857143 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42453445984 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9946337952 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179072196708 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846931108126 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313575158251 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122890642067 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160279524001 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.