The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004.

The chart illustrates the yearly salary of doctors and other workers in several nations in the year 2004.

Overall, It is evident that the US gave a higher pay for doctors than any other given country and the annual earnings of doctors were far higher than those of other workers in each country.

The annual pay of doctors in the USA $120000, which was double that of Italian doctors ($60000). A resemblance can be observed in France and Switzerland. Doctors in both countries annually earned around $70000, followed by Czech Republic and Germany with just over $60000. In Finland, doctors received a comparatively low yearly salary of only $50000.

In contrast, the earnings of other workers were much lower at $45000 in the US whereas those in two countries regarding France and Finland were annually paid $30000 and roughly $25000, respectively. Swiss workers received the greatest wage of $40000 in Europe, which was twice as high as that of Italy, Czech Republic and Germany ($20000).

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, It is evident that the US gave a higher pay for doctors than any other...
^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e US gave a higher pay for doctors than any other given country and the annual e...
^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the USA 20000, which was double that of Italian doctors 0000. A resemblance can ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91515151515 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43945228615 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8439897425 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303049451774 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127006891768 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953511694723 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21478344345 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110823547028 0.0819641961636 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.