The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in1999.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in1999.

The bar graph elucidates the ratio of australian males and females in terms of their post-school qualifications in 1999. Overall, it is clearly evident that the percentages of men were higher than that of women in three education levels, namely skilled vocational diploma, postgraduate diploma and master's degree while more australian female completed undergraduate courses than men’s did in this year.Turning to more details, the highest percentage of males, 90% to be exact, completed vocational skilled diploma in 1999 in Australia, which it was precisely 9 times higher compared to female’s ratio with the same qualification. However, interestingly, 70% women did their undergraduate diploma in the same year while only around 35% men gained the same degree. The higher the qualification level, the greater the percentage of men achieved this degree. For instance, 70% men gained postgraduate diploma while it was merely 30% in the case of women. Besides, 20% more men received their master’s degree compared to 40% female master’s degree holders

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Turning
...ourses than men's did in this year.Turning to more details, the highest percentage...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58282208589 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17383730733 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.914736591 43.030603864 355% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131256274361 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806945464363 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393652769825 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131256274361 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.