The chart below shows the proportion of males and females in Malaysia who commonly do physical activity in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where necessary.
The chart shows the comparison of the proportion that differentiate by gender in Malaysia who exercise regularly in the year 2010. Overall, Malaysian female was known to exercise more than male in all of age groups, except of group of 15-24.
Male in 15-24 exercised more regularly than female, resulting in, had more percentage of over 50%, while female had less difference with less than 50%. However, the rest of age groups, male was lost in percentage. Male in 25 to 34 experienced a downfall of percentage with just over 40%, and the number kept decreasing slightly to nearly 40% for the group 35 to 44. Moreover, male in 45 to 54, 55 to 64, and 65 and over, showed more interest in exercising as the percentage rose to around 40%, 45%, and 46% respectively. The latter had similar percentage as female.
In the other hand, female with range of age between 25 to 34, had percentage on exercising of nearly 50%. The number increased to over 50% for age group of 35 to 44. The similar measurement also occured for both age groups of 45 to 54 and 55 to 64.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-04 | gisellanathania | 71 | view |
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Many local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with larger supermarkets in the area How does this effect local communities How could this situation be improved 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
- The table demostrates the change in six types of transportation used by commuters in three cities between 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.546875 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64180611324 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4767019899 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103623001883 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506731657972 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769802088009 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941656679796 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831433176258 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.