The chart below shows reason why people travel to work by bicycle or by car

Essay topics:

The chart below shows reason why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.

The two supplied pie charts compare the different considerations why people commute to working places by bike or by vehicle.

Overall, the two highest proportion of people choosing cycling to commute to workplaces are the reason of health and fitness and less pollution, whereas reason of comfort is preferred by the most people for driving.

Regarding cycling to work, health and fitness and less pollution are the 2 major segments of the reasons, both accounting for slightly below three fifths of total reasons. Out of five reasons, other three reasons comprise under a fifths, while no parking problems account for 15 percent. In addition, the reason of no cost make up 13 percent, as compared to slightly less by 1 percent in the reason of faster than driving as the least people preferred.

Looking specifically at reason for driving to work, reason of comfort is the major proportion, totaling four fifths of total reasons. The next major proportion is distance to work, comprising slightly over two fifths of reasons. In stark contrast, both reason of need to carry things to work and faster than cycling experience slightly under 15 percent, in contrast to slightly less by 3 percent in the least reason of safer than cycling.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cycle'.
Suggestion: to cycle
...o highest proportion of people choosing cycling to commute to workplaces are the reason...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fifth' or simply 'fifths'?
Suggestion: a fifth; fifths
...ons, other three reasons comprise under a fifths, while no parking problems account for ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05339805825 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62822276571 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2172218253 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217566298536 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104676564129 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050352614404 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151078265936 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328262803011 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.