The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
The bar charts depict the percentage of males and females getting married accross a range of age groups in a certain country in 1996 and 2008.
Overall, whereas the proportion of people under 30 marrying seemed to decrease after 12 years, there was an upward trend in terms of those over 30. Besides, men tended to get married when they get older, while that of women was relatively smaller. Noticeably, 25 to 29 and 30 to 34 were the ideal ages for getting married in both genders.
The rate of married women from 16 to 19 was by far smallest and decreased a half after over a decade (0.5 per cent in 2008 vs. 1 per cent in 1996). The number increased sharply with age untill reaching its peak when they were 25 to 29 at about 11,5 per cent and remained relatively unchanged after 12 years. Similarly, the proportion of men who got married saw also a rise when they were from 20 - 24 to 25 - 29, 2,5 and 9, respectively, although no men married when they were under 20 years old. In 2008, the figure dropped by 1 per cent in comparison with that in 1996.
In contrast, once those residents were over 30, married rate decreased steadily with age. The numbers for married men tended to be considerably higher than women. After 12 years, there was an increase by 1 per cent in terms of married men, and by 0,5 per cent for women.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3967611336 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3606260359 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534412955466 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8636618778 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235548784091 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953154747518 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554618160144 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160945864344 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630296580017 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.