The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The diagrams illustrate the proportion of Yemen and italy population categorized by age in 2000 and 2050. Overall, the productive age group shared the largest proportion of Yemen population in 2000, while the lowest number was the elderly group. Also, it is predicted that the share of the elderly group in italy experienced a dramatic increase and, the percentage of productive age group will incline in 2050.
Initially, in Yemen, the number of young people shared half of the total population in 2000. In contrast, it is predicted that the productive age group will have the highest number in 2050 (57,3%). Moreover, the number of young people is 37,2% in 2050, that figure similar to that of the productive age group in 2000 (46,3%). Furthermore, there will be a slight increase in the proportion of senior citizen group, from 3,5% in 2000 to 5,7% in 2050.
Moving to italy, in 2000, the productive age group share the majority of its country population. Followed by the elderly group and young people, the former accounted just below a quarter, the letter shared 14,3%. In 2015, however, there will be a change on the figure. productive age and elderly group share similar number, 46,2% and 42,3% each and, young people will account 11.5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Productive
..., there will be a change on the figure. productive age and elderly group share similar num...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91904761905 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53442958737 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457142857143 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5681720974 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9090909091 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22945818237 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119619552597 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957034706487 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182364247187 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808172447615 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.