The charts below show the percentage of school-aged boys and girls in secondary school and higher education in four region in the world in 2000.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of school-aged boys and girls in secondary school and higher education in four region in the world in 2000.

The bar charts give information about the rate of men and women, being in school-aged, going to secondary school and higher education in four regions in the world in 2000.

Overall, the percentage of school-aged boys and girls in intermediate school was much more than that of further education. Another interesting point is the latter and the former shared the similar pattern on ranking among four regions examined, with the highest proportion being possessed by Europe, followed by America and South Asia, while Sub-Saharan Africa region hold the smallest figure in the charts.

While almost entire young people in recommended age went to middle school in Europe, the opposite was true for Sub-Saharan Africa with the percentage of boys and girls getting such school being 30% and 24% respectively, being less than one-third of the figure of Europe. Additionally, almost 60% of school children in both genders attended high school in America and South Asia.

Interestingly, the rate of women being higher than that of men by almost twofold in higher education was only seen in America region in the chart (29% and 17% respectively), the opposite was true for other regions with the different between the figure of two genders being no more than 5%. In addition, there was almost 60% teenagers in Europe continuing their education path in college and university, being over two times as high as the figure of America and South Asia, strikingly, higher than that of Sub-Saharan Africa by six fold.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 530, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fold' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'folds'.
Suggestion: folds
... than that of Sub-Saharan Africa by six fold.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, third, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13360323887 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.665886613 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502024291498 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8467757361 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.142857143 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2857142857 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341469011541 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184711723546 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130373130638 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247319471345 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119402370966 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.