The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The diagrams illustrate the ability of UK students in one of England’s University to communicate in different language in a decade. Overall, there were two languages (spanish and french) experienced a decrease number, while no and two other languages saw an increasing figure. In addition, no other language accounted for the highest number in the reported year.
In the first year, the student who mainly spoke English accounted as the biggest figure in both years. It shared a-third in 2000 and increased by about 5% in 2010. Following which was spanish (20%). Then, french only and another language shared a similar number, 15% each. Finally german and two other languages observed as the lowest number on additional language spoken by the student, 10% respectively.
In 2010, three categories of the language used to communicate by the students (no other language, another language, and two other languages) increased to about 5% each. In contrast, spanish and french only experienced a decreasing trend, 10%, and 5% respectively. Furthermore, the number of students who communicate in german only saw a similar number that of 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ch experienced a decrease number, while no and two other languages saw an increasi...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...uage shared a similar number, 15% each. Finally german and two other languages observed...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2967032967 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9223538724 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521978021978 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6719199633 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6363636364 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251597087112 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961252963421 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607961976527 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186300859544 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014858641082 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.