The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
A glance at the provided graph and table reveals the fugures for water usage in the world. Information in the graph shows the global water used in each sector from 1900 to 2000, while the table shows data on water comsumpted in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, the water demand for agriculture, industrial and domestic fields rose significantly during the period shown. Moreover, from the table, the amount of water consumption in Brazil is dwarfed by the one in Congo in 2000.
In 1900, the water usage from agriculture ranked first with nearly 500 km3 following by industrial and domestic sectors with a similar figure (nearly 100 km3). After, the figure for agriculture increased rapidly by over 500 km3, while the data on industrial use and domestic use saw modest growth and had the negligible gap. However, at the end of the period, the figure for industrial use increased more rapidly than the one for domestic use and reached its peak at over 1000 km3 .Meanwhile, the peak reached by agriculture was about three times as big as the industrial field was.
In the year 2000, the residents of Brazil and Congo was 176 million and 5.2 million, respectively. Irrigated land in Brazil, at 26,500 km3, also much higher than that in Congo, at only 100 km3. In comparison to water consumption per person, therefore, the figure for Brazil was more than.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...se and reached its peak at over 1000 km3 .Meanwhile, the peak reached by agricultu...
^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
... and reached its peak at over 1000 km3 .Meanwhile, the peak reached by agriculture was ab...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84549356223 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53059526491 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50643776824 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7915655508 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196689618024 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927626096105 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750178254401 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142847987309 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923124979833 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.