The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates changes in the number of cars in Britain during the period from 1971 to 2007.
Overall, there were general upward trends in those who owned two and three cars or more, whereas the proportion of people without a car experienced a reverse pattern. It is also clear that the figure for one car ownership generally remained over the given period.
Starting at around 45% in 1971, the rate of people with one car was almost unchanged until 2007. In comparison, about 8% of British citizens possessed two cars in the first year. In the following 11 years, the proportion of this group witnessed a dramatic increase to reach its peak of nearly 27%, compared to a nearly twofold decrease from just under 50% to 25% in 2007 in terms of people who had no car.
Regarding the remaining group, only 1% owned three or more cars in the first eight years. However, there was a continual rise in its figure, reaching roughly 16% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 90
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
- The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 75
- The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tain during the period from 1971 to 2007 Overall there were general upward trends...
^^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...generally remained over the given period Starting at around 45 in 1971 the rate o...
^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...increase to reach its peak of nearly 27 compared to a nearly twofold decrease from just ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2007 in terms of people who had no car Regarding the remaining group only 1 own...
^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing roughly 16 at the end of the period
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47398843931 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3560852473 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 173.0 22.4926829268 769% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 774.0 112.824112599 686% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 173.0 22.9334400587 754% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 44.0 5.23603664747 840% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258079435546 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.258079435546 0.103423049105 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169061852509 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119835371115 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 86.1 13.2329268293 651% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -78.74 61.2550243902 -129% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 67.2 10.3012195122 652% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.83 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.14 8.06136585366 188% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.2 10.9970731707 647% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.