The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram provided illustrate the information about how many grams of three types of spreads was consumed by people daily in a nation. Overall, it is evident that the number of spreads consuming experienced a declining trend at the end of the period.
In the initial year, margarine was the highest number of spreads consuming. It stood as around 141 grams per person. In the next following five years, it reached a peak of using, approximately 158 grams, before it decreased sharply to about 100 grams in 1991. Following which, the number changed gradually and reach the lowest number at around 50 gram at the end of the period.
The figure for low fat and reduced spreads was initially almost a half that of margarine in the first year. In 1986, the number decreased slightly to around 80 grams and then rose to 100 grams in 1991. For five years the figure remains stable and then decline steeply to just about 50 grams in the final year.
Butter consumption was originally started to record in 1996. The initial figure was about 10 grams per person. During the first five years, the number increases dramatically to just above 80 grams before witnessed a half decrease in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...nd reach the lowest number at around 50 gram at the end of the period. The figure ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7572815534 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4601451325 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509708737864 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6479538239 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0519158315431 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236486039885 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283567589011 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405832141746 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311681548959 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.