The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph provides information about one caribbean island between years 2010 and 2017. It summarizes details of number of visitors and either they stayed on island or on cruise ships.

In the year 2010, number of tourist of island were one million and after that number of visitors continuously increased till the year 2015. For next year number of visitors remained exact. In the year 2017, amount of visitor increased where number of visitors reached to their peak number.

During the visit of island some visitors decided to stay on island on contrary some of them decided to stay on cruise ship. Here, we can clearly see that during the year 2010 to2015, trend of staying on island was higher than staying on cruise ships. In year 2013, 1.5 million people stayed on island whereas only 0.5 million people stayed on cruise ship. After that trend of staying on cruise started growing and around middle of the year 2015 both the trends were same nearly 1.5 million. From that point , it is clearly seen that people rather preferred staying on cruise ships over staying on island.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...same nearly 1.5 million. From that point , it is clearly seen that people rather p...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83510638298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09781520736 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8112877538 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157085002488 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823440382266 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737860371748 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146272034069 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770621300788 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.