The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The given line graph illustrates about the amount of goods being transported by four different means in the UK from the year 1974 to 2002. The unit to measure goods is given to be in tons.

Overall, the given graph shows that carrying goods by the mean of roadways had always been predominated since 1974 to 2002. More than 70 million tons of goods were carried by road ways in 1974 gradually increasing to more than 80 million tons in 1992. But, this number got dramatically decreased to less than 80 million tons in 1995. However, after 1995 the number got sharply escalated to almost 100 million tons in 2002.

Unlike the rest of the means of transport, the pipeline means even though being the lowest means of goods transport had never faced atrophy in amount of goods carried since 1974 to 2002. Starting at 2 million tons in 1974, the measure substantially reached its peak in 1995 to more than 20 million tons.

The goods transfer by means of water ways even though maintained its stable peak from 1986 to 1994 (60 million tons), it fell slightly to 55 million tons till 1998. But, it got sharply increased to reach its peak of 65 million tons in the year 2002.

The amount of goods transferred by railways, even though slightly fell to less than 30 million tons in 1995, it rose substantially to its peak of more than 40 million tons in the 2002.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to almost 100 million tons in 2002. Unlike the rest of the means of transpor...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3345154777 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444897959184 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0676354269 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.45454545455 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2025437114 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986115105902 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112965775547 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141295940726 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10452967411 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.