The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart provides the number of goods delivered using four means of transportation in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002. Overall, there was an upward trend in the figure of goods transported via road, water, and pipeline, while rail was relatively unchanged. In addition, road observed as the highest figure during the period.

In 1974, the figure for goods transported using road was the biggest and it stood at around 70 million tonnes, followed by a moderate increase of about 81 million in 1992. Then, the number incline significantly and finished the period just below 100 million.

The quantities of goods moved by water and rail began at almost similar number, the former was just below 40 million and the latter precisely 40 million. The figure for water increased significantly during 12 years, then it fell off about 52 million in 1998 and ended the period in more than 20 million increase that of the initial year. In contrast, the number of rail fluctuated and accounted in an almost similar number of 1974.

In 1974, the share of pipeline witnessed as the lowest figure. it stood at around 5 million and rose to more than 4 times in the final year.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ipeline witnessed as the lowest figure. it stood at around 5 million and rose to m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79802955665 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50288968862 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541871921182 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1421404297 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117658765904 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514818544483 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053070902907 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767225760622 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046585768864 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.