The graph blow shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purpose between 1989 and 2009 Summaruze the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the number of travellers who visit to England for three different reasons ( Business, holiday and to meet friends and relatives) over a period of 20 years from 1989 to 2009. The number of people in millions.

With regards to visitors travelled to UK, it initiated in 1989 and then dramatically rise and reached its zenith point at 9 millions in 1999 before declining considerably to about 6.5 millions in 2004. After five years, it again reached to 9 millions.

Throughout the period, the number of visitors to united kingdom went through many fluctuations, it inclined steadily from 5 millions in 1989 to 7 millions in 2009. Whereas, overseas visitors to met friends and relatives depict upward trend from 1989 to 2004 and in last year the number of travellers decreased to 6 millions from 7 millions.

From the overall analysis, the number of visitors from foreign to England for various purposes rose up during the period ,whilts most of the people came to UK for trade.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to England for three different reasons Business, holiday and to meet friends an...
^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rious purposes rose up during the period ,whilts most of the people came to UK for...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92352941176 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67595340834 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8838837258 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207227348952 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938268171571 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054617191693 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129821529289 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471989733715 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.