The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram provided illustrate the information about the United Kingdom’s citizenship.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the number of people holding the uk’s passport. Meanwhile, the number of Asia, Africa and Europe immigrated to britain experienced an increasing figure, except for America, Australia and others.
Increasing from approximately 20 thousand in 1972 to about 38 thousand in the following one decades, the number of people obtained uk’s citizenship then levelled off at around 37 thousand in 1982. This was followed by a moderate growth to approximately 50 thousand in 1992 before reached the peak number at roughly 110 thousand in the last reported year.
Moving to bar chats, 49 thousand asian immigrated to britain in 1996, rising by 9 thousand in 2002. Both european and African immigrants shared a similar figure (9 thousand) in the initial year. The european figure tripled in 1992, while the asian inclined of about 16 thousand. In contrast, the number for American, Australian and others commenced as the least (5 thousand), falling by 20% in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one decade', 'a decade', or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: one decade; a decade; decades
...2 to about 38 thousand in the following one decades, the number of people obtained uk'...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38728323699 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92598621019 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8411233618 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778993896874 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388821481315 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559095081933 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693169024466 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685079443992 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.